Desktop software
ARUCOST
From estimate to site control, in one program.
KHM / STUDIO — Services
Kotlin Multiplatform and Flutter
A shared codebase can simplify maintenance, but the decision depends on the product. We compare interfaces, business rules, integrations and device capabilities to assess whether Kotlin Multiplatform, Flutter or another architecture fits.
Discuss your project ↗Share the right code. Keep the right differences.
A worker's mobile app and a desktop estimating tool have different rhythms and requirements. Sharing data or calculations does not mean duplicating every screen. Platform-specific testing, permissions, distribution and integrations still need to be planned.
What we work on
- A comparison of approaches and a documented architecture decision.
- Separation of shared logic and platform-specific requirements.
- Consistent components, navigation and states on agreed platforms.
- Backend integration with defined data contracts.
- Separate test and delivery steps for every platform in scope.
How we work together
We discuss the cost of the whole product, not just the percentage of shared code. Mi Jornada provides a mobile product example using Kotlin Multiplatform; ARUCOST shows a different use case focused on desktop work. Each case identifies the material actually available.
Before we start
Which is better: Kotlin Multiplatform or Flutter?
There is no universal answer. We assess the desired experience, integrations, target platforms and future code ownership before recommending a tool.
Does shared code remove the need for iOS and Android testing?
No. Each platform retains its own behaviour and requirements. Testing and release preparation are planned separately.
Real projects
A closer look
Mobile app
Mi Jornada
Clocking in and running the team, no hassle for anyone.